--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur BrowserStack, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp Belgique 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de bug tracking](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://fr.getapp.be/software/170655/browserstack Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.be/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack est une plateforme de test cross-browser qui permet aux développeurs d'intégrer des outils pour effectuer des tests automatisés, visuels et en direct sur des applications mobiles et des sites web. Les équipes DevOps peuvent également exécuter des tests en local sur les applications WIP (Work In Progress) sans les héberger dans des environnements publics. > > Conclusion : 775 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 775 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - A/B Testing - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Alerts/Escalation - Analyse de la productivité - Analyse des causes profondes - Analyse des tendances - Analyse prédictive - Analyse statique - Analyse visuelle - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Authentification unique - Automated Testing - Benchmarking - Bibliothèque de questions - Capture d'écran - Catégories personnalisables ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://fr.getapp.be/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://fr.getapp.be/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://fr.getapp.be/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://fr.getapp.be/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://fr.getapp.be/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://fr.getapp.be/directory/389/testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://fr.getapp.be/software/2041995/usabilityhub-1) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 2. [TestRail](https://fr.getapp.be/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://fr.getapp.be/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (73 reviews) 4. [Lightster](https://fr.getapp.be/software/2073473/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) 5. [Userbrain](https://fr.getapp.be/software/130543/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) ## Avis ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing with Some Cost Considerations" — 4.0/5 > **Azmal** | *2 avril 2026* | Gestion de l'enseignement | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is its instant access to a wide range of real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. The ability to perform live, manual testing on both iOS and Android devices directly from the browser is extremely convenient and saves a lot of setup time. I also found the platform very useful for: Quick debugging with real-time interaction Consistent performance across devices and OS versions Ease of use — no complex installation or configuration required Reliable cloud infrastructure, which makes testing smooth even for remote teams Overall, it significantly improves testing efficiency and helps identify real-world issues that emulators often miss. > > **Inconvénients**: The main drawback is the cost, especially for small teams or when you need extended access to real devices for manual testing. I also faced a few practical limitations: Session time limits and concurrency restrictions can slow down testing when multiple testers are involved Occasional lag or latency, particularly when network conditions aren’t ideal Limited free access, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly before committing Device availability issues at peak times (some popular devices are not always instantly accessible) > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient platform for testing applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need to maintain physical infrastructure. The ability to perform live, manual testing on real iOS and Android devices is a major advantage, helping to identify real-world issues that are often missed in emulators. The platform is easy to use, quick to set up, and integrates well into existing testing workflows. However, there are some limitations, such as pricing, session limits, and occasional latency, which can impact productivity during heavy usage. Overall, it is a powerful and practical solution for cross-platform testing, especially for teams that need quick access to multiple devices, but it may require careful cost management depending on usage. ----- ### "Everything under a single umbrella\!" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *7 avril 2026* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: it offers a variety of features from mobile devices to test, manage reports and integration with tools like jira and CI/CD pipelines > > **Inconvénients**: Connectivity issues while performing Device testing. This is not all the time, however, i do face this issue from time to time. > > Overall a great SaaS application which makes life easy since it offers all major featureslike tools to ttest, report and integration with other apps. All in one\! ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *1 avril 2026* | Services d'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Inconvénients**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "The tool that removed the biggest uncertainty from my development process" — 5.0/5 > **Chintan** | *6 mai 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I genuinely appreciate is that it fits into your work without demanding attention. I do not have to learn a new complex system or change how I work. I just open it when I need to verify something and it delivers exactly what I need - a real browser, a real device, real results. Before a project goes live I run through the key pages on Chrome, Safari and a couple of Android and iOS devices. The whole check takes maybe 15 minutes and I have caught layout issues, font problems and touch behavior bugs that I would have completely missed otherwise. That 15 minutes has saved me hours of post delivery fixes more times than I can count. The session recordings and logs are also genuinely useful. When something looks off I can go back and understand exactly what happened instead of trying to reproduce it blindly. > > **Inconvénients**: I don't have strong complaints. The one thing I would mention is that session startup can feel a little slow on some days. When you are in a hurry before a deadline that small wait feels longer than it actually is. Pricing is also something smaller teams need to plan around carefully. > > It quietly became one of those tools I do not think about until I imagine working without it - and then I really do not want to. My delivery confidence improved, client feedback on UI issues reduced and I spend less time fixing things after handover. For anyone who cares about what their work actually looks like in the real world, BrowserStack earns its place in the workflow. ----- ### "Great Tool for Mobile Automation Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Shubham** | *15 octobre 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I would say the ease of initial setup, Jenkins and Github Actions integrations and the ability to quickly debug different test logs in case of failures by looking at the videos for the test runs. > > **Inconvénients**: Once every few months, we do run into false failures due to a bad state on the device but generally it gets addressed quite quickly. > > We use BrowserStack to do automated testing of our Android App in conjunction with Espresso and Android Instrumentation test framework. We have quite a complex app and a lot of automated tests around it that we run on every PR with a Jenkins integration. The overall setup has been quite helpful for us to catch any bugs on the Github PR itself and has helped greatly in increasing our app stability and stopped us from shipping critical bugs on a lot of occasions. The overall experience of setup and running BrowserStack has been quite easy for us. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.be/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://fr.getapp.be/software/170655/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées